Timeline for Programming / database questions with no clear Open Data focus
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13 at 15:41 | comment | added | J-J-J | I don't follow the argument. Opening data means making it public. But data extraction may be aimed at private or confidential use of the data, so it does not necessarily imply opening data. | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.opendata.stackexchange.com/ with https://opendata.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| May 9, 2013 at 15:05 | comment | added | Vince | Yeah, I don't discuss all aspects of open data. I just mean some programming questions are related to open data because the programming will result in opening up data. But indeed, there is another deal, the license. | |
| May 9, 2013 at 14:55 | comment | added | Patrick Hoefler | Machine readability is one important aspect. However, take for example the IMDb Top 250: It is very machine readable, and still it is nowhere close to open. Why? Because the data is not published under an open license. To make the concept of Open Data clearer, I strongly recommend Tim Berners-Lee's 5 Star Scheme where he explains the different aspects of high-quality Open Data. | |
| May 9, 2013 at 14:47 | history | answered | Vince | CC BY-SA 3.0 |