As we say goodbye to the old year and welcome the new one, we have a tradition of sharing moderation stats for the preceding calendar year.

As most of you here are aware, sites on the Stack Exchange network are moderated somewhat differently to other sites on the web:

We designed the Stack Exchange network engine to be mostly self-regulating, in that we amortize the overall moderation cost of the system across thousands of teeny-tiny slices of effort contributed by regular, everyday users.
-- A Theory of Moderation

That doesn't eliminate the need for having moderators altogether, but it does mean that the bulk of moderation work is carried out by regular folks. Every bit of time and effort y'all contribute to the site gives you access to more privileges you can use to help in this effort, all of which produce a cumulative effect that makes a big difference.

So as we say goodbye to 2022 (and where did January go, right?) and dive head first into 2023, let us look back at what we accomplished as a community... by looking at some exciting stats. Below is a breakdown of moderation actions performed on Open Data over the past 12 months:

Action Moderators Community¹
Answer flags handled 91 43
Answers flagged 0 126
Comment flags handled 63 477
Comments deleted⁷ 68 245
Comments flagged 0 540
Posts bumped 0 830
Posts deleted⁶ 61 225
Posts locked 0 11
Posts undeleted 1 3
Posts unlocked 0 1
Question flags handled⁵ 25 33
Questions closed 21 0
Questions flagged⁵ 0 47
Questions migrated 3 0
Questions protected 0 2
Questions reopened 1 0
Tasks reviewed⁴: "Close votes" queue 12 12
Tasks reviewed⁴: "First answers" queue 4 56
Tasks reviewed⁴: "First questions" queue 39 175
Tasks reviewed⁴: "Late answers" queue 0 8
Tasks reviewed⁴: "Low quality posts" queue 4 21
Tasks reviewed⁴: "Suggested edits" queue 22 122
Users destroyed³ 1 0
Users suspended² 0 20


¹ "Community" here refers both to the membership of Open Data without diamonds next to their names, and to the automated systems otherwise known as user #-1.

² The system will suspend users under three circumstances: when a user is recreated after being previously suspended, when a user is recreated after being destroyed for spam or abuse, and when a network-wide suspension is in effect on an account.

³ A "destroyed" user is deleted along with all that they had posted: questions, answers, comments. Generally used as an expedient way of getting rid of spam.

⁴ This counts every review that was submitted (not skipped) - so the 2 suggested edits reviews needed to approve an edit would count as 2, the goal being to indicate the frequency of moderation actions. This also applies to flags, etc.

⁵ Includes close flags (but not close or reopen votes). Community can handle these flags by at least one person voting to close a question that has a close flag.

⁶ This ignores numerous deletions that happen automatically in response to some other action.

⁷ This includes comments deleted by their own authors (which also account for some number of handled comment flags).

Further reading:

Wishing everyone a happy 2023! ^_^

1 Answer 1


Thanks for the statistics!

I would say this site is easier to moderate than most, maybe because it is not a prime target for spammers.

By the way, I think the site is small and rather quiet but useful to its users. :-)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .