Timeline for Shall creating or cloning services from scratch be considered on-topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://opendata.stackexchange.com/ with https://opendata.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.opendata.stackexchange.com/ with https://opendata.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jan 26, 2016 at 23:28 | history | edited | Patrick HoeflerMod |
edited tags
|
|
May 21, 2015 at 4:30 | history | edited | albert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spellihg
|
May 25, 2013 at 16:44 | history | edited | user135 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 100 characters in body
|
May 25, 2013 at 2:37 | history | edited | user135 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 479 characters in body
|
May 24, 2013 at 23:34 | history | edited | user135 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
May 24, 2013 at 21:30 | comment | added | Alison R. | What does "og" mean in the context of this title? | |
May 24, 2013 at 16:31 | history | edited | user135 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
May 24, 2013 at 16:29 | comment | added | Joe | I'd also suggest that the title of this item being changed. 'Additions to the FAQ' is just way too generic. | |
May 24, 2013 at 15:21 | comment | added | Joe | @DeerHunter : you're not the only one who interpreted it that way. That was my reason to flag it and now that I have enough rep, vote to close. The data is available, but I guess we have to ask ourselves if 'CC-BY-NC' qualifies as "open" or not. (and for those who weren't around when CDDB went commercial -- for those projects that started open and then went commercial, there's usually a free alternative that forked at the time of the license change. It's just a question as to if it's been maintained. | |
May 24, 2013 at 9:19 | answer | added | ldodds | timeline score: 3 | |
May 23, 2013 at 21:32 | comment | added | Deer Hunter | @AlisonR. - Gee, what is open data, then? /me thinks this is a point sorely missing in the FAQ - commercial vs non-commercial, kind of license, etc. | |
May 23, 2013 at 21:29 | answer | added | Deer Hunter | timeline score: 2 | |
May 23, 2013 at 21:28 | comment | added | Alison R. | @DeerHunter The question of whether the OP wanted to build a non-open dataset can't truly be answered by the current wording of the question. It only specifies a desire for commercial use. | |
May 23, 2013 at 21:25 | comment | added | Deer Hunter | And what is left, then? The community has to settle in the FAQ upon the definition of open data first :) - meta.opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/15/… and meta.opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/7/… The question was about building a non-open dataset, and that was my own reason for a snide remark. | |
May 23, 2013 at 21:20 | answer | added | Alison R. | timeline score: 4 | |
May 23, 2013 at 21:15 | history | edited | user135 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
May 23, 2013 at 20:55 | history | asked | user135 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |